|
|
|
|
Comparative performance and digestibility of
nutrients
in pure and cross bred lambs
|
Sayeed Mehdi Mousavinia*1, Gholamreza
Shadnoush2, Farshad Zamani1, 2, Mehdi Babaiee1
and Mostafa Faghani1 |
1Departemantof
Animal Sciences, Faculty
of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord branch, Shahrekord, Iran; 2Department of Animal
Science, Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, Shahrekord,
Iran
|
|
Abstract |
This
study was investigated to
compare the performance and digestibility of nutrients in Lori Bakhtiari
(LB) and Romanov × Lori Bakhtiari (R×LB) cross bred lambs. In the first
trial, 24 animals at the age of 4 months (12 LB and 12 (R×LB) cross bred
lambs) were randomly allocated to individual pens in order to determine
fattening performance for a period of 90 days. In the second trial, 3
animals at the age of 10 month from each breed were randomly allocated
in individual metabolic cages to determine the in vivo
digestibility for 7 days after adaptation period. The results showed
that there were no significant effect in initial body weight, daily
gain, feed conversion ratio and feed efficiency between treatments. LB
lambs had significantly (P<0.05) higher feed intake compared to R × LB
cross bred lambs. The study showed that there were no significant
differences for digestibility of dry matter, protein, ether extract,
acid detergent fibre, neutral detergent fibre, phosphorus, calcium,
magnesium and iron between the two breeds. In conclusion the results
showed that R× LB cross breed had no significance effect on feed
digestibility and fattening characteristics of cross breed lambs. The
study indicated that cross breeding was successful in term of consuming
less feed with no compromise on weight gain.
|
Keywords:
Ram lambs; Lori Bakhtiari,
Romanov × Lori Bakhtiari; fattening performance; digestibility |
|
To cite this article:
Mousavinia SM, G
Shadnoush, F Zamani, M Babaiee and M Faghani, 2015.
Comparative performance and digestibility of
nutrients
in pure and cross bred lambs.
Res.
Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci., 5(1): 47-52. |
|
|